BP’s “Day of Reckoning”

The US Department of Justice leveled a $4 billion judgement against BP for its criminal behavior in the explosion at its Deepwater Horizon oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico in April of 2010.  The Guardian characterized the judgement this way:  “BP met its day of reckoning in the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster on Thursday when the company admitted guilt on 14 criminal charges…”

DOJ’s press release quoted Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer:  “The explosion of the rig was a disaster that resulted from BP’s culture of privileging profit over prudence.”  That’s certainly nothing new for the oil industry. Continue reading


Print pagePDF page
Download PDF

Obama and the Climate

You will not be surprised to learn that I think that Barack Obama is the clear choice for President in this election.  I have lauded the President and his actions all along the way during the past four years.  He has brought some fabulous actors on energy and the environment into his administration and they have produced some truly useful outcomes.  I certainly question some aspects of the program, like giving aid and comfort to nuclear power and “clean coal,” but by and large he has pushed as hard as politically and physically possible during his first term.  His second term will undoubtedly build on the successes of the first, and may even culminate in a comprehensive greenhouse gas regime for this country and an international agreement with teeth.  It depends on how a number of the political stars align. Continue reading


Print pagePDF page
Download PDF

McKibben’s Manifesto

I mentioned Bill McKibben’s recent blockbuster article at Rolling Stone in passing the other day.  If you didn’t know about the reality of the climate crisis before reading the article, you do now.  This article may well have the impact that Elizabeth Kolbert’s Field Notes from A Catastrophe had a few years back.  If you were only “concerned” or “cautious” – in the parlance of Yale’s ongoing “Six Americas” study – you’re going to be moved into the “alarmed” category. Continue reading


Print pagePDF page
Download PDF

“Unambiguously Correct”

Believe it or not, there was another momentous federal court decision in late June other than the one on health care.  The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found that the EPA’s key “endangerment” finding on greenhouse gases and the regulatory regime that it has pursued is not only not, as the petitioners asserted, based on “improper constructions” of the Clean Air Act and “otherwise arbitrary and capricious,” but rather that the finding and the EPA’s program are entirely in keeping with the law.  EPA has been unambiguously correct in its reading of the Clean Air Act and its procedures, according to the court. Continue reading


Print pagePDF page
Download PDF